The Harts’ legacy began with patriarch Stu Hart’s founding of Calgary’s Stampede Wrestling in 1948, continued with Stu’s son, Bret “Hit Man” Hart, becoming one of the most beloved WWE Champions of all time and remains with Bret’s niece, Natalya, staking claim on the Divas roster.

The Hart Foundation first debuted in WWE during the 1980s when Bret and his brother-in-law, Jim “The Anvil” Neidhart, Natalya’s father, battled Davey Boy Smith and The Dynamite Kid, who also became members of the family by marriage. At Survivor Series 1993, Bret and his brothers Owen, Keith and Bruce were victorious as a team, and Owen later defeated Bret in the main event of WrestleMania X. In 1997, The Hart Foundation was reborn with Bret, Owen, Neidhart and Davey Boy.

Twelve years later, the family reemerged in WWE as The Hart Dynasty, including Natalya and Davey Boy’s son, David Hart Smith. And today, Natalya continues to represent the Harts’ storied legacy in WWE. — ZACH LINDER

The Lagos State Police Command says it has detained one of its officers who allegedly r@ped a 17-year-old girl at the Area H Command, Ogudu.

The command’s spokesperson, SP Benjamin Hundeyin, confirmed the arrest in a statement on Sunday, July 14.

According to the News Agency of Nigeria, the girl became a victim of alleged vi%lent s+xual a§§ault while trying to recover her alleged st%len phone by some cr+minals.

Investigation revealed that the said police officer, who got wind of the st%len phone, offered to help track the girl’s missing phone after taking her statement.

It also learnt that the officer, simply identified as Owolabi, allegedly deceptfully tricked the teenager with false information that police operatives had arrested the suspected thi£f.

“The officer then lured the girl with the false information. When she arrived his office, he allegedly r@ped the girl under g¥n point,” a source said.

  Animals can be divided into three types which are wild and domestic animals. The domestic animals has many types which one of them are pet. Pet are animals which human beings have inorder to keep them company.

  In this article, I will be showing you types of animals you should keep as pet in your house:

1. Monkey.

2. Parrot.

3. Chicken.

4. Dog.

5. Cat.

6. Pigeon.

7. Squirrel.

8. Mouse.

9. Tortoise.

10. Dove.

11. Toad.

12. Fishes.

13. Pegiun.

14. Snail.

15. Butterfly.

16. Dragon.

17. Bee.

18. Grasshopper.

19. Peacock.

20. Bunny.

Which of the animals do you prefer to keep as pet. Don't forget to like, share and comment. Thanks for reading.

The United States (U.S.) Supreme court has ruled that citizens don’t have a constitutional right to bring their noncitizen spouses into the U.S.

According to Washington Times, the court, in a 6-3 ruling on Friday, June 21, 2024, reaffirmed Congress’s broad power to set immigration limits and the executive branch’s role in carrying out those orders in deciding who can come.

The justices had previously ruled that a would-be migrant lacks the constitutional right to challenge those decisions, and it now ruled that U.S. citizens don’t have the right, either.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, said “we hold that a citizen does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country.”

The case was brought by Sandra Munoz, a U.S. citizen who argued she had a right to sue to get her husband, Luis Ascencio-Cordero, a citizen of El Salvador, into the U.S.

The state department denied him a visa because it suspected he had ties to the vi@l£nt gang Mara Salvatrucha, or MS-13, based on four of his body tattoos.

Would-be migrants don’t generally have a right to challenge their denials, but Ms. Munoz argued she had a right because the decision was hindering her own marriage rights. She said that right is at least strong enough to earn the chance to argue her husband isn’t a member of MS-13.

Justice Barrett said the law doesn’t stretch that far.

“Munoz has suffered h@rm from the denial of Asencio-Cordero’s visa application, but that h@rm does not give her a constitutional right to participate in his consular process,” Barrett wrote.